<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/?rss=yes"><title>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><description>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry RSS feed: Current Issue. 
 The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry , now in its 57th year, continues to be a highly respected and trusted resource. The 
Journal is the official publication for 25 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations and is the leading professional journal 
devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. It features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, 
dental materials, and research findings. Color photos illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The  Journal  serves prosthodontists 
and dentists in advanced practice.  The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry  is the highest ranked Prosthodontics title by number 
of citations on the on the 2007 Journal Citation Reports®, published by Thomson Reuters.</description><link>http://www.prosdent.org/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0022-3913</prism:issn><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>August 2010</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001071/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600947/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600959/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600960/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600972/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600984/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600996/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS002239131060100X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601011/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601023/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601035/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601047/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601059/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601060/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601072/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601084/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601096/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001083/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001095/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001010/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001022/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001009/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001034/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001046/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001071/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Restoration using gingiva-colored ceramic and a ridge lap pontic with circumferential pressure: A clinical report</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001071/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Achieving an optimal esthetic result when replacing missing teeth with implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone is a demanding surgical and restorative challenge. This clinical report describes the use of a cantilevered, cemented, implant-supported restoration with gingiva-colored ceramics and a circumferential pressure-ridge lap pontic to replace 2 incisors and the adjacent tissue.
			</description><dc:title>Restoration using gingiva-colored ceramic and a ridge lap pontic with circumferential pressure: A clinical report</dc:title><dc:creator>Tae Hyung Kim, Domenico Cascione, Alena Knezevic, Hessam Nowzari</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00107-1</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600947/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600947/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M.   Dent Mater 2009;25:e63-71. Epub 2009 Jun 11.</description><dc:title>Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60094-7</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600959/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Use of zirconia collar to prevent interproximal porcelain fracture: A clinical report</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600959/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Ensuring the longevity of crown restorations is an important objective for the clinician. Veneering porcelain fracture needs to be addressed when considering restoration longevity. This clinical report presents the use of a CAD/CAM-aided design to produce a zirconia substructure with a collar that will acheive the same supportive results as a substructure fabricated by full contour waxing and cut back.
			</description><dc:title>Use of zirconia collar to prevent interproximal porcelain fracture: A clinical report</dc:title><dc:creator>Carl M. Pogoncheff, Renee E. Duff</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60095-9</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600960/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Strategic considerations in treatment planning: Deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600960/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Prosthodontists face the difficult task of judging the influence and significance of multiple risk factors of periodontal, endodontic, or prosthetic origin that can affect the prognosis of an abutment tooth. The purpose of this review is to summarize the critical factors involved in deciding whether a questionable tooth should be treated and maintained, or extracted and possibly replaced by dental implants. A MEDLINE (PubMed) search of the English, peer-reviewed literature published from 1966 to August 2009 was conducted using different keyword combinations including treatment planning, in addition to decision making, periodontics, endodontics, dental implants, or prosthodontics. Further, bibliographies of all relevant papers and previous review articles were hand searched. Tooth maintenance and the acceptance of risks are suitable when: the tooth is not extensively diseased; the tooth has a high strategic value, particularly in patients with implant contraindications; the tooth is located in an intact arch; and the preservation of gingival structures is paramount. When complete-mouth restorations are planned, the strategic use of dental implants and smaller units (short-span fixed dental prostheses), either tooth- or implant-supported, as well as natural tooth abutments with good prognoses for long-span FDPs, is recommended to minimize the risk of failure of the entire restoration.
			</description><dc:title>Strategic considerations in treatment planning: Deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth</dc:title><dc:creator>Nicola U. Zitzmann, Gabriel Krastl, Hanjo Hecker, Clemens Walter, Tuomas Waltimo, Roland Weiger</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60096-0</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600972/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Receive JPD Tables of Contents by E-mail</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600972/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>To receive tables of contents by e-mail, sign up through our Web site at http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ympr.   Log on and click “Register” in the upper right-hand corner. After completing the registration process, click on “My Alerts,” then “Add Table of Contents Alert.” Select the category “Mosby” or type The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry in the search field and click on the Journal title. You may add tables of contents alerts by accessing an issue of the Journal and clicking on the “Add TOC Alert” link.</description><dc:title>Receive JPD Tables of Contents by E-mail</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60097-2</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600984/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of pretest storage conditions of extracted teeth on their dentin bond strengths</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600984/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Statement of problem: 
				It is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain sufficient freshly extracted human teeth to utilize in in vitro studies, particularly for bonding investigations.
			
				Purpose: 
				The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different storage conditions for human extracted teeth prior to their use in microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing.
			
				Material and methods: 
				Thirty incisors were divided into groups according to their storage time and condition. The first group consisted of freshly extracted teeth. Teeth of the second group were stored in chloramine-T at 4°C for 2 years ±1 month. The last group was stored dry for up to 2 years ±2 months, after which teeth were rehydrated in distilled water for 2 weeks before use. All teeth were disinfected using 0.5% chloramine-T. Dentin surfaces were exposed and then bonded using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose or Clearfil SE Bond to composite resin foundations (Esthet-X). Following 24-hour storage, bonded teeth (n=30) were sectioned into beams with a cross-section of 0.9 ±0.1 mm2 and subjected to μTBS testing using a microtensile testing machine (Micro Tensile Tester). Data were calculated and statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (α=.05). Failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope at ×40 magnification.
			
				Results: 
				Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the different storage conditions nor between the 2 adhesive systems for each storage condition (P&gt;.05). Modes of failure for all tested groups were predominantly adhesive followed by mixed.
			
				Conclusions: 
				Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that aging of teeth and storage conditions had no significant effect on dentin microtensile bond strength to composite resin.
			</description><dc:title>Effect of pretest storage conditions of extracted teeth on their dentin bond strengths</dc:title><dc:creator>Enas H. Mobarak, Wafa El-Badrawy, David H. Pashley, Hana Jamjoom</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60098-4</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600996/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Dental implants in patients with ectodermal dysplasia and tooth agenesis: A critical review of the literature</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310600996/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Yap AK, Klineberg I.   Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:268-76.</description><dc:title>Dental implants in patients with ectodermal dysplasia and tooth agenesis: A critical review of the literature</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60099-6</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS002239131060100X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of surface treatment on flexural strength of zirconia bars</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS002239131060100X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Statement of problem: 
				Clinical and laboratory processing techniques induce damage to the surface of zirconia frameworks, which significantly lessens their strength.
			
				Purpose: 
				The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of 3 surface restoration methods on the flexural strength of zirconia bars.
			
				Material and methods: 
				Bar-shaped specimens were polished and received 1 of 2 surface treatments (n=20): airborne-particle abrasion with 110-μm aluminum oxide particles at a pressure of 0.2 MPa, or grinding with a diamond point under water cooling and a load of 2 N using an air turbine. Polished specimens served as the control (n=20). The induced surface damage was restored using one of the following restoration methods: polishing of the specimens using an aluminum oxide polishing point (2-μm grit) coated with 0.5-μm diamond polishing paste, application of a thin coat of glazing porcelain according to the manufacturer's instructions, or application of a phosphate ester monomer (MDP) containing an adhesive resin. The specimens were subjected to a 4-point flexural strength test and then examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the data (α=.05).
			
				Results: 
				There was a significant interaction between the type of surface damage and the restoration method (P&lt;.001). For the ground specimens, all restoration methods resulted in a statistically significant regain in strength, with the polishing procedure being the most effective (1027 MPa). For airborne-particle-abraded specimens, application of the bonding agent was the only effective restoration method. SEM analysis of the fractured surfaces of specimens indicated that application of the bonding agent resulted in sealing of the surface damage produced by airborne-particle abrasion, while polishing was successful in removing the grinding lines produced by the diamond point.
			
				Conclusions: 
				Within the limitations of this in vitro study, restoration of surface damage improved the flexural strength of zirconia specimens.
			</description><dc:title>Effect of surface treatment on flexural strength of zirconia bars</dc:title><dc:creator>Moustafa N. Aboushelib, Hang Wang</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60100-X</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601011/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Interfacial corrections of maxillofacial elastomers for Kubelka-Munk theory using non-contact measurements</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601011/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Hu X, Gilbert AB, Johnston WM.   Dent Mater 2009;25:1163-8. Epub 2009 May 21.</description><dc:title>Interfacial corrections of maxillofacial elastomers for Kubelka-Munk theory using non-contact measurements</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60101-1</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601023/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601023/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Statement of problem: 
				Little is known about the wear behavior of ceramics opposed to unveneered zirconia and whether wear varies according to microstructure, surface toughness, and flexural strength of the ceramics.
			
				Purpose: 
				The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 2-body wear resistance of 5 ceramics opposing unveneered zirconia ceramic.
			
				Material and methods: 
				Yttrium-stabilized zirconia, lithium disilicate glass ceramic, leucite-reinforced glass ceramic, fluorapatite glass ceramic, and nanofluorapatite glass ceramic specimens (n=8) were tested against standardized zirconia balls. Wear tests were performed in a dual-axis mastication simulator. Wear resistance was calculated by measuring the vertical and volumetric substance loss using a laser scanner. Specimen surfaces were evaluated at x50 and x500 magnification using SEM. Data were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Fisher's exact test (α=.05).
			
				Results: 
				Zirconia specimens demonstrated significantly lower vertical and volumetric loss than other ceramics (P&lt;.05). The wear of fluorapatite and nanofluorapatite glass ceramics was significantly greater than that of leucite-reinforced and lithium disilicate glass ceramics (P&lt;.05). SEM images showed no cracks or flaws in the zirconia and leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic specimens, indicating a mixture of attritional and adhesive wear. Other ceramic specimens exhibited cracks and chipped particle spaces which were consistent with fatigue wear. Zirconia demonstrated the lowest vertical and volumetric wear values. Leucite-reinforced and lithium disilicate glass ceramics demonstrated nonsignificant differences in volumetric wear, but these values were significantly lower than those observed for nanofluorapatite and fluorapatite glass ceramics (P&lt;.05).
			
				Conclusions: 
				Wear varied according to the structure of the ceramic tested. Wear was of the fatigue type, and was significantly lowest in the zirconia specimens tested.
			</description><dc:title>Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic</dc:title><dc:creator>Zakereyya S.M. Albashaireh, Muhamad Ghazal, Matthias Kern</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60102-3</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601035/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effects of investment type and casting system on permeability and castability of CP titanium</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601035/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Statement of problem: 
				Several factors, such as casting systems and investment properties, are important to obtain a sound titanium casting. Although various casting systems and investments for titanium are commercially available, their effects on CP titanium castability are not clear.
			
				Purpose: 
				The purpose of this study was to determine permeability of investments and to evaluate the effects of investment type and casting system on titanium castability.
			
				Material and methods: 
				Three investments for titanium (experimental gypsum-bonded investment, Selevest CB, and Speed Titan) and 4 titanium casting systems (Cyclarc, Ti-Cascom, Vulcan T, and Ticast Super R) were used. Permeability was measured using a flow meter and argon gas at 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa. Castability was calculated as the percentage of reproduced holes compared to a perforated wax pattern. Data for castability and permeability were analyzed separately with 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05).
			
				Results: 
				The ANOVA for permeability and castability showed significant interaction (P&lt;.001 and P=.004, respectively). Differences in permeability among the 3 investments increased with a higher gas pressure. Permeability of the experimental investment at each pressure level was significantly greater than that of the other investments, except for Speed Titan at 0.1 MPa (P&lt;.05). The permeability of Selevest CB at each pressure level was significantly less than that of the other investments (P&lt;.05). Cyclarc and Ti-Cascom specimens were not significantly different, in terms of castability, using the investments evaluated, but castability of Vulcan T and Ticast specimens varied significantly by the investment used (P&lt;.05).
			
				Conclusions: 
				Within the limitations of this study, investment type, pressure level, and their combinations influenced permeability. Castability of titanium was influenced by investment type, casting system, and their combinations. The investment with the highest permeability did not demonstrate the best result for castability.
			</description><dc:title>Effects of investment type and casting system on permeability and castability of CP titanium</dc:title><dc:creator>Fazal Reza, Hidekazu Takahashi, Naohiko Iwasaki, Yukimichi Tamaki</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60103-5</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>114</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>121</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601047/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Journal Back Issues Available to Subscribers</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601047/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>As a service to our subscribers, copies of back issues of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry for the preceding 5 years are maintained and are available for purchase from Elsevier, Inc until inventory is depleted. Please write to Elsevier, Inc, Subscription Customer Service, 6277 Sea Harbor Dr, Orlando, FL 32887, or call 800-654-2452 or 407-345-4000 for information on availability of particular issues and prices.</description><dc:title>Journal Back Issues Available to Subscribers</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60104-7</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>121</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601059/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The effect of equilibrating mounted dental stone casts on the occlusal harmony of cast metal complete crowns</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601059/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				Statement of problem: 
				Fabrication of indirect complete crowns that are in occlusal harmony upon insertion remains a problem in restorative dentistry, and dental stone cast expansion may play a role.
			
				Purpose: 
				This 3-part investigation compared occlusal contacts in a simulated patient with a harmonious occlusion with centric occlusion equal to maximum intercuspation (CO=MI) and an inharmonious occlusion (CO≠MI) with mounted stone casts, and compared the occlusal contacts after fabrication of a posterior complete crown fabricated on equilibrated and nonequilibrated dental stone casts.
			
				Material and methods: 
				A dentoform mounted in a semi-adjustable articulator served as the simulated patient and control. In part 1, a single set of maxillary and mandibular ADA type IV and V derived dental stone casts were fabricated and mounted (CO≠MI), and occlusal contacts/near contacts were compared. In part 2, 10 type IV and 10 type V cast mountings (CO=MI) were compared. In part 3, 10 type IV cast mountings were fabricated for adjustment (experimental) and 10 for no adjustment (control). A mandibular ADA type IV gold alloy complete crown was fabricated and adjusted on each set of casts and then returned to the dentoform. Vinyl polysiloxane interocclusal records of all mountings were scanned for optical density, and contacts were used to quantify occlusal contacts as exhibiting contact or near contact. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05).
			
				Results: 
				The cast adjustment protocol (intervention) was successful in eliminating the majority of the occlusal disharmony in the casts believed to be caused by the effects of stone expansion. Actual and near contact areas for cast mountings of the equilibrated simulated patient were significantly different from those of the simulated patient (P&lt;.001; P=.001, respectively). Actual and near contact areas for inserted crowns fabricated from adjusted casts were significantly different from those of the simulated patient (P&lt;.001; P=.007, respectively), but actual contact areas were not different from those of the simulated patient with no crown inserted.
			
				Conclusions: 
				In this study, occlusal contacts of a simulated patient (dentoform) could not be accurately replicated with mounted dental stone casts. A cast adjustment procedure can aid in fabrication of a crown with a more accurate occlusion.
			</description><dc:title>The effect of equilibrating mounted dental stone casts on the occlusal harmony of cast metal complete crowns</dc:title><dc:creator>Joe C. Meng, William W. Nagy, Carl G. Wirth, Peter H. Buschang</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60105-9</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>122</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601060/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of titanium surface characteristics on the behavior and function of oral fibroblasts</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601060/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Att W, Yamada M, Ogawa T.   Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:419-31.</description><dc:title>Effect of titanium surface characteristics on the behavior and function of oral fibroblasts</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60106-0</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>132</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601072/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Defining available restorative space for implant overdentures</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601072/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				It is important to diagnostically evaluate available restorative space prior to implant placement. Failure to accurately assess restorative space may result in esthetically and structurally compromised prostheses and patient dissatisfaction. This article describes various techniques for evaluating restorative space in edentulous patients. Information gained will help dentists during treatment planning, attachment selection, and prosthesis design prior to surgical implant placement.
			</description><dc:title>Defining available restorative space for implant overdentures</dc:title><dc:creator>Swati Ahuja, David R. Cagna</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60107-2</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>136</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601084/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Mold filling and dimensional accuracy of titanium castings in a spinel-based investment</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601084/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Fischer J, Ebinger A, Hågi T, Stawarczyk B, Wenger A, Keller E.   Dent Mater 2009;25:1376-82. Epub 2009 Aug 7.</description><dc:title>Mold filling and dimensional accuracy of titanium castings in a spinel-based investment</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60108-4</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>136</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>136</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601096/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Method to simplify a direct implant impression using an extended guide pin</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310601096/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Implant impression techniques can be subdivided into indirect (transfer) and direct (pickup) types. The direct impression technique requires a 2-piece impression coping with a removable guide pin that screws directly into the abutment or onto the implant. An open-tray impression technique allows access to the guide pin after the material has polymerized so that the copings can be removed without disturbing their orientation within the impression during removal from the mouth.</description><dc:title>Method to simplify a direct implant impression using an extended guide pin</dc:title><dc:creator>Soong-Ryong Jung, Jill D. Bashutski</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60109-6</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>137</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001083/abstract?rss=yes"><title>News and Notes</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001083/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>All items for this section must be in the Editor's office 10 weeks before month of issue.   
					</description><dc:title>News and Notes</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00108-3</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001095/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Display ad</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001095/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Display ad</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00109-5</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>142</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>142</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001010/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Editorial Board</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001010/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Editorial Board</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00101-0</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001022/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Sponsoring Organizations and Liaisons</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001022/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Sponsoring Organizations and Liaisons</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00102-2</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001009/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Table of Contents</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001009/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Table of Contents</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00100-9</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001034/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Information for Authors</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001034/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Authors must adhere to the Journal guidelines, which are provided to ensure the expeditious processing of manuscripts. Complete information on manuscript submission may be found at http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ympr. Failure to follow Journal guidelines may result in the rejection of manuscripts or delays in the review process and publication.</description><dc:title>Information for Authors</dc:title><dc:creator>Carol A. Lefebvre</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00103-4</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001046/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Information for Readers</title><link>http://www.prosdent.org/article/PIIS0022391310001046/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>If you have questions or comments regarding original articles and editorial management, please contact:   Dr Carol A. Lefebvre, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th St, AD-2943, Augusta, GA 30912-1255; telephone (706) 721-4558; fax (706) 721-4571.</description><dc:title>Information for Readers</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00104-6</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-08-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-08-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>104</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0022-3913(10)X0008-7</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>