Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 104, Issue 2 , Pages 98-104, August 2010

Effect of surface treatment on flexural strength of zirconia bars

  • Moustafa N. Aboushelib, MS, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
  • ,
  • Hang Wang, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Prosthodontics Unit, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Stomatological Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr Hang Wang, Prosthodontic Unit, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Stomatological Hospital, Sichuan University, 14 RenMinNanLu Block 3, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, CHINA, Fax: 0086 28 85582167

Statement of problem

Clinical and laboratory processing techniques induce damage to the surface of zirconia frameworks, which significantly lessens their strength.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of 3 surface restoration methods on the flexural strength of zirconia bars.

Material and methods

Bar-shaped specimens were polished and received 1 of 2 surface treatments (n=20): airborne-particle abrasion with 110-μm aluminum oxide particles at a pressure of 0.2 MPa, or grinding with a diamond point under water cooling and a load of 2 N using an air turbine. Polished specimens served as the control (n=20). The induced surface damage was restored using one of the following restoration methods: polishing of the specimens using an aluminum oxide polishing point (2-μm grit) coated with 0.5-μm diamond polishing paste, application of a thin coat of glazing porcelain according to the manufacturer's instructions, or application of a phosphate ester monomer (MDP) containing an adhesive resin. The specimens were subjected to a 4-point flexural strength test and then examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the data (α=.05).

Results

There was a significant interaction between the type of surface damage and the restoration method (P<.001). For the ground specimens, all restoration methods resulted in a statistically significant regain in strength, with the polishing procedure being the most effective (1027 MPa). For airborne-particle-abraded specimens, application of the bonding agent was the only effective restoration method. SEM analysis of the fractured surfaces of specimens indicated that application of the bonding agent resulted in sealing of the surface damage produced by airborne-particle abrasion, while polishing was successful in removing the grinding lines produced by the diamond point.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, restoration of surface damage improved the flexural strength of zirconia specimens.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Support for this study was provided by the research enhancement program (Alex Rep) of Alexandria University, and the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry (SRF for ROCS, SEM), grant number 20091001-9-4.

PII: S0022-3913(10)60100-X

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60100-X

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 104, Issue 2 , Pages 98-104, August 2010