Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 6 , Pages 352-361, June 2010

The effect of acid etchant type and dentin location on tubular density and dimension

  • Ana Carolina Rocha Lima Caiado, MSc, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Area of Endodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Mario Fernando de Goes, PhD, MSc, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Area of Dental Materials, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Francisco José de Souza-Filho, PhD, MSc, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, Area of Endodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Frederick A. Rueggeberg, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Section Director, Dental Material Sciences, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr Frederick A. Rueggeberg, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Room AD-3265A, The Medical College of Georgia, 1459 Laney Walker Blvd, Augusta, GA 30912-1260, Fax: 706-721-8349

Statement of problem

Coronal and radicular dentin may react differently to the type of acid treatment used when bonding to these substrates.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare dentin morphology, tubular density, and cross-sectional area in deep coronal (around an exposed pulp horn) and root canal dentin at the cervical third in the intact state and after acid etching with phosphoric acid or self-etching dentin primer.

Material and methods

Extracted, human, caries-free premolars were fixed. Smear layer-free sections (control) were obtained and divided into 3 groups: left intact, etched with phosphoric acid, or etched with a self-etching primer from a dentin bonding system. Specimens were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Tubular density and cross-sectional area were determined from the images using software. Values were submitted to multifactorial ANOVA (α=.05).

Results

Tubular density was not significantly affected by acid type or by dentin location. Acid type significantly (P<.001) affected tubular cross-sectional area: phosphoric acid > self-etching resin > intact dentin, irrespective of dentin location. All acid-treated specimens showed demineralization, and irregular surface morphology was not affected by either acid treatment.

Conclusions

Tubular density was not significantly different between deep coronal and root canal dentin nor affected by acid treatment type. Tubular cross-sectional area did not differ between deep coronal or root canal dentin, regardless of acid treatment. Both acid types significantly increased tubular cross-sectional area at both dentin locations, phosphoric acid to a greater degree than the self-etching primer. Root canal dentin did not display peritubular dentin. (J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:352–361)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant no. 05/53290-0, and The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq), grant no. 310845/2006-8.

PII: S0022-3913(10)60076-5

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60076-5

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 6 , Pages 352-361, June 2010