Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 5 , Pages 288-294, May 2010

Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials

  • Markus Balkenhol, Prof Dr med dent

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr Markus Balkenhol, Justus Liebig University, Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, GERMANY, Fax: +49-641-9946 139
  • ,
  • Sylvia Haunschild

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
  • ,
  • Christina Erbe, Dr med dent

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Bernd Wöstmann, Prof Dr med dent

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany

Statement of problem

Upon removal, tear forces occur in various areas of an impression. As a result, thin sulcus details may be permanently deformed, affecting the impression's accuracy.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the chemistry and prolonged setting time on the permanent deformation of light-body impression materials after stretching.

Material and methods

A dumbbell-shaped mold (2 mm × 4 mm × 75 mm) was used to prepare specimens (n=20) of 6 different impression materials (Affinis Light Body, Aquasil Ultra XLV, Express 2 Light Body Flow Quick, Flexitime Correct Flow, P2 Polyether Light, and Impregum Garant L DuoSoft). After water storage (35°C), either for the manufacturer's suggested setting time or for 5 minutes, specimens were stretched by 80% using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 200 mm/min. The permanent deformation (Δl (%)) was determined after 2 hours of storage in ambient conditions. A 2-way ANOVA followed by a Games-Howell test was used to analyze the influence of material and storage time (α=.05).

Results

Polyether materials showed a significantly higher permanent deformation (Δl>4% to 5%) than vinyl polysiloxane materials (P<.05). Extending the manufacturer's suggested setting time resulted in clinically relevant improvements in elastic recovery for products with a polyether backbone only.

Conclusions

Increasing the setting time might be necessary for impression materials with a polyether backbone to improve elastic recovery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(10)60060-1

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60060-1

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 5 , Pages 288-294, May 2010