Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 4 , Pages 245-252, April 2010

Effect of surface treatments and cyclic loading on the bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth with autopolymerized repair acrylic resin

  • Graham K. Meng, BS

      Affiliations

    • Dental student, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
  • ,
  • Kwok-Hung Chung, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr Kwok-Hung Chung, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, D-767B HSC, Box 357456, Seattle, WA 98195-7456, Fax: 206-543-7783
  • ,
  • Madelyn L. Fletcher-Stark, DDS, MSD

      Affiliations

    • Resident, Graduate Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
  • ,
  • Hai Zhang, DMD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash

Statement of problem

Fracture of denture teeth from the denture base is a common problem associated with dental prostheses. Fractured tooth surfaces treated with chemical agents and mechanical features have the potential for improved repair strength.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare bond strengths of denture teeth to autopolymerized repair acrylic resin after various surface treatments, before and after cyclic loading.

Material and methods

Mandibular lateral incisor denture teeth were selected and ground on the ridge-lap portion using a standardized jig. Specimens with a ground surface were used as controls. The experimental groups included: ground plus airborne-particle abraded, ground plus diatoric recess, and ground plus an experimental bonding agent. The teeth were affixed by an autopolymerized repair acrylic resin to denture bases. Specimens (n=10) were subjected to compression testing (5 mm/min) at a 135-degree angle, before and after 14,400 loading cycles at 2 Hz and 22 N. Peak load to dislodgement was recorded and statistically analyzed (2-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD, α=.05). The specimens were then examined using x10 magnification, and fractures were categorized as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.

Results

The mean bond strengths ranged from 26.3 N to 44.2 N. There were no significant differences in fatigue versus nonfatigue strength values within each group (P=.244). Significant strength differences were found (P<.001) between the ground control, diatoric recess, and bonding agent groups. Microscopic examination revealed that the bonding agent group obtained the highest percentage of mixed-type fractures.

Conclusions

The use of a bonding agent and the placement of a diatoric recess in the denture tooth resulted in higher bond strengths than grinding alone. Cyclic loading had no significant impact on the bond strength of denture teeth to the autopolymerized repair acrylic resin. (J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:245-252)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at the 87th General Session of the International Association for Dental Research meeting, Miami, Fla, April 2009.Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant T32DE07132 and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR, 5 R25 DE018436).

PII: S0022-3913(10)60038-8

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60038-8

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 4 , Pages 245-252, April 2010