Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 3 , Pages 139-147, March 2010

Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants

  • Hasan Suat Gokce, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Sciences Center, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr Hasan Suat Gokce, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Sciences Center, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik, 06018, Ankara, TURKEY, Fax: 0090 312 3046020
  • ,
  • Bulent Piskin, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Former Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Sciences Center, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Dogan Ceyhan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Chief, Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Van Military Hospital, Van, Turkey
  • ,
  • Sila Mermut Gokce, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Sciences Center, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Van, Turkey
  • ,
  • Volkan Arisan, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Scientist, Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Statement of problem

The lighting conditions of the environment and visual deficiencies such as red-green color vision deficiency affect the clinical shade matching performance of dental professionals.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.

Material and methods

Two sets of porcelain disc replicas of 16 shade guide tabs (VITA Lumin) were manufactured to exact L*a*b* values by using a colorimeter. Then these twin porcelain discs (13 mm × 2.4 mm) were mixed up and placed into a color-matching cabinet that standardized the lighting conditions for the observation tests. Normal and red-green color vision-deficient dental professionals were asked to match the 32 porcelain discs using standard artificial daylight D65 (high color temperature) and tungsten filament lamp light (T) (low color temperature) illuminants. The results were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA and paired and independent samples t tests for the differences between dental professionals and differences between the illuminants (α=.05).

Results

Regarding the sum of the correct shade match scores of all observations with both illuminants, the difference between normal vision and red-green color vision-deficient dental professional groups was not statistically significant (F=4.132; P=.054). However, the correct shade match scores of each group were significantly different for each illuminant (P<.005). The correct shade matching scores of normal color vision dental professionals were significantly higher with D65 illuminant (t=7.004; P<.001). Color matching scores of red-green color vision-deficient dental professionals (approximately 5.7 more pairs than with D65) were significantly higher with T illuminant (t=5.977; P<.001).

Conclusions.

Within the limitations of this study, the shade matching performance of dental professionals was affected by color vision deficiency and the color temperature of the illuminant. The color vision-deficient group was notably unsuccessful with the D65 illuminant in shade matching. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the shade matching performance of the color vision-deficient group with T illuminant. The lower color temperature illuminant dramatically decreased the normal color vision groups' correct shade matching score.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(10)60020-0

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60020-0

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 103, Issue 3 , Pages 139-147, March 2010