Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 102, Issue 5 , Pages 319-327, November 2009

Pressure transmission and distribution under impact load using artificial denture teeth made of different materials

  • Thitima Phunthikaphadr, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Graduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • ,
  • Hidekazu Takahashi, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor and Chair, Advanced Biomaterials, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Mansuang Arksornnukit, DDS, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr Mansuang Arksornnukit, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10300, THAILAND, Fax: 662-218-8534

Statement of problem

Pressure transmission and distribution under denture bases may be different depending on the material of the artificial denture teeth used.

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to evaluate pressure transmission and distribution under impact load using artificial denture teeth composed of different materials, and to examine the modulus of elasticity of the artificial denture teeth.

Material and methods

The denture base specimens with artificial denture teeth made of 4 different materials (acrylic resin, microfilled composite resin, nanocomposite resin, and ceramic) were evaluated. Pressure transmission, distribution, and maximum pressure (n=10) were observed with pressure-sensitive sheets under an impact load. Modulus of elasticity of the artificial denture teeth (n=10) was measured by using an ultramicroindentation system. Data were statistically analyzed with 1-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD and Tamhane's multiple range post hoc tests (α=.05).

Results

Maximum pressure transmission observed from ceramic denture teeth was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<.001). Nanocomposite resin denture teeth presented the lowest pressure transmission, whereas a localized stress transmission area was observed in the ceramic denture teeth group. Significant differences in the modulus of elasticity were observed among the 4 types of artificial denture teeth (P<.001).

Conclusions

Pressure transmission and distribution varied among the denture tooth materials. Differences in the modulus of elasticity of each type of denture tooth were demonstrated. (J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:319-327)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(09)60183-9

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60183-9

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 102, Issue 5 , Pages 319-327, November 2009