Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 99, Issue 4 , Pages 314-321, April 2008

Ten-year follow-up of mandibular advancement devices for the management of snoring and sleep apnea

  • Sachin Jauhar, BDS

      Affiliations

    • Specialist Registrar, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Glasgow Dental Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • Mervyn F. Lyons, BDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Lecturer, Section of Restorative Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr M.F. Lyons Section of Restorative Dentistry Dundee Dental School Park Place Dundee DD1 4HR UNITED KINGDOM Fax: +44 (0)1382 635 984
  • ,
  • Stephen W. Banham, MB ChB, MD

      Affiliations

    • Consultant Physician, Department of Respiratory MedicineGartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • Donald A. Cameron, MSc

      Affiliations

    • University Teacher, Unit of Prosthodontics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • Robin Orchardson, BSc (Hons), BDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Lecturer, Unit of Oral BiologyUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Statement of problem

Intraoral mandibular advancement devices have become widely used in recent years for the management of snoring and sleep apnea, and short-term effectiveness has been demonstrated. However, there is a shortage of data regarding long-term compliance.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term compliance of patients who were provided with a mandibular advancement device.

Material and methods

Records of 180 patients who were provided with a mandibular advancement device in 1996 were available for review. A questionnaire was sent to all of these patients inquiring about continued device usage, comfort, and effectiveness. Questions were also asked about smoking, alcohol consumption, height, and weight. Data were analyzed with chi-square tests for any association between these factors and success of the device (α=.05).

Results

The response rate was 40%, with 72 replies. Of this number, 34 patients were currently wearing the device every night, with a further 13 wearing the device for up to 6 nights per week. Thirty-one of the respondents who were wearing the device felt more refreshed on waking. The median body mass index (BMI) was 30, 8 were smokers, and 12 subjects drank more than 20 units of alcohol per week. Few adverse effects of the device were reported.

Conclusions

The mandibular advancement device appears to be an effective long-term solution for a significant number of patients with problem snoring and also those with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. (J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:314–321)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(08)60067-0

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60067-0

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 99, Issue 4 , Pages 314-321, April 2008