Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 297-301, April 2006

Effect of dentin bonding and ferrule preparation on the fracture strength of crowned teeth restored with dowels and amalgam cores

  • Filiz Aykent, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Filiz Aykent, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Campus, Konya, 42079, TURKEY, Fax: 90-332-2410062
  • ,
  • Mustafa Kalkan, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Doctor, Oral Health Center, Antalya, Turkey
  • ,
  • Munir Tolga Yucel, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Research Fellow, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University
  • ,
  • Atilla Gokhan Ozyesil, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University

Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey; Oral Health Center, Antalya, Turkey

Statement of problem

It is necessary to obtain an adequate bond at the core/dentin junction where the majority of failures occur. The effect of recently developed dentin bonding agents on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth at the amalgam core/dentin junction is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 2 dentin bonding agents and a ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned mandibular premolars incorporating prefabricated dowel and silver amalgam cores.

Material and methods

Sixty extracted mandibular second premolars were divided into 6 groups of 10 each. The coronal portion of each tooth was removed at the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) in the first 3 groups. In the other groups, teeth were sectioned 1 mm above the CEJ to create a ferrule. After root canal preparations, prefabricated dowels (ParaPost) were placed. The first group served as a control and was tested without application of bonding agents and without incorporation of a ferrule design. In the second and third groups, respectively, an autopolymerizing adhesive (Superbond D-Liner) and a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Panavia F) were applied to tooth surfaces before restorative procedures. For the fourth (ferrule) group, no bonding agent was applied, but a 1-mm ferrule preparation was used. In the fifth (ferrule+D-Liner) and sixth (ferrule+Panavia F) groups, respectively, autopolymerizing and dual-polymerizing bonding agents were used in conjunction with the ferrule preparation. After amalgam core fabrication, Ni-Cr full cast crowns for each group were prepared and cemented. All specimens were stored in water for 1 week and thermal cycled 1000 times between 5° and 55°C. A compressive shear load was applied at an angle of 135 degrees to the crown, and the maximum load at fracture (N) was recorded. The data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference tests (α=.05).

Results

Significantly higher fracture strength values were demonstrated for the ferrule+Panavia F (652.5 N), ferrule+D-liner (649.1 N) and ferrule (592.4 N) groups, respectively, than for the other groups. The next highest fracture strength values were found for the D-Liner (485.0 N) and Panavia F (486.3 N) groups. The control group (376.6 N) demonstrated the lowest fracture strength in all test groups (P<.001).

Conclusion

A ferrule preparation or a bonding agent designed for silver amalgam core–dentin bonding can each increase the fracture strength for teeth receiving cast crowns after endodontic therapy and dowel and amalgam core restorations.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(06)00107-7

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.025

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 297-301, April 2006