Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 323-326, April 2006

A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies

  • Daniel Dunham, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Staff, Prosthodontic Department, Ft. Bragg
  • ,
  • James S. Brudvik, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor Emeritus, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Washington School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • W. Jack Morris, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Director, US Army Prosthodontic Residency Program, Ft. Gordon
  • ,
  • Kevin D. Plummer, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • Stephen M. Cameron, DDS

      Affiliations

    • US Army Prosthodontic Residency Program, Retired, Ft. Gordon
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Stephen M. Cameron, 1533 Clary Cut Rd, Appling, GA 30802, Fax: 706-787-7528

Prosthodontic Department, Ft. Bragg, NC; University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; US Army Prosthodontic Residency Program, Ft. Gordon, Ga; Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, Ga

Statement of problem

Removable partial denture frameworks are complex castings fabricated from high-shrinkage alloys. This may result in difficulty in achieving accurate fit.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate which component(s) of the clasp assembly contact the abutment tooth clinically.

Material and methods

New and existing frameworks with at least 1 conventional prepared occlusal rest were evaluated for fit. The spacing between the bottom of each of the rests of the 50 clasp assemblies and the corresponding rest seat were recorded with vinyl polysiloxane. The fit of each rest was determined with the use of a dial caliper by measuring, in micrometers, the thickness of the record between the rest and the bottom of the rest seat. The Kennedy classification was also recorded. A 2-sample t test was used to evaluate the difference in fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported designs (α=.05).

Results

The average space between the rest and prepared rest seat was 193 ± 203 μm, with a range of 0 to 828 μm. Twenty tooth-tissue frameworks had an average space of 136 ± 160 μm and 30 tooth-supported frameworks had an average space of 230 ± 222 μm. The 2-sample t test showed no significant difference for fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported frameworks (P=.1081). Twenty-four percent of rests had contact in the prepared rest seat.

Conclusion

The majority of rests evaluated did not contact the intended surfaces.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the the United States Army or the Department of Defense.

PII: S0022-3913(06)00057-6

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.001

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 323-326, April 2006