Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 286-289, April 2006

Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials

  • Arzu Mujdeci, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant, Department of Operative Dentistry
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Arzu Müjdeci, Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 06500-Besevler, Ankara, TURKEY, Fax: 90 312 2126250
  • ,
  • Osman Gokay, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry

Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

Statement of problem

There is no consensus concerning the effect of bleaching gels on microhardness of restorative materials. Information about the effect of whitening strips on microhardness of restorative materials is also limited.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a bleaching gel and a whitening strip on the microhardness of 3 tooth-colored restorative materials.

Material and methods

Forty cylindrical specimens (6 × 2 mm) of each restorative material, including a nanohybrid composite resin (Grandio), a polyacid-modified composite resin (Dyract eXtra), and a glass-ionomer cement (Ionofil Molar AC), were prepared and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The specimens were then polished using medium, fine, and superfine polishing disks and stored in 37°C distilled water for 7 days. Specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=10). One group was selected for baseline Vickers hardness measurements (load 100 g, dwell time 20 seconds) of the top surfaces. The other 3 groups were treated for 21 days with 1 of the following: distilled water (control), bleaching gel (10% carbamide peroxide), or whitening strip (14% hydrogen peroxide). The top surfaces of the treated specimens were also subjected to the same hardness testing performed for the baseline specimens. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference tests (α=.05).

Results

There were no significant differences in microhardness between the test groups of each restorative material. However, significant differences in microhardness were observed among restorative materials. For all test groups, composite resin showed the highest hardness values, whereas glass-ionomer cement presented the lowest (P<.05).

Conclusion

The bleaching products used in this study did not adversely affect the microhardness of the restorative materials.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(06)00039-4

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.010

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 95, Issue 4 , Pages 286-289, April 2006