Controlled failure mechanisms toughen the dentino-enamel junction zone
Statement of problem
The dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) durably unites dissimilar hard brittle enamel and tough flexible dentin. In contrast to artificial bonds between restorations and dentin, the DEJ rarely fails except when it is affected by inherited disorders. Knowledge of DEJ toughening mechanisms is important in understanding inherited disorders, in biomimetic engineering of junctions between artificial restorations and teeth, and in tissue-engineering a DEJ.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to identify specific DEJ-zone failure mechanisms and to survey the fracture toughness of the human DEJ zone.
Material and methods
Fracture toughness indentations were made at 3 sites across the DEJ zone of 10 human incisor teeth. Failure modes identified using optical microscopy and fracture toughness (MPa·m1/2) were calculated following Vickers microindentation. Site mean values were then calculated and compared using 1-way analysis of variance (α=.05).
Results
The DEJ did not undergo catastrophic interfacial delamination; instead, damage was distributed over a broad zone. The primary damage mode involved cracking and damage dispersion in the specialized first-formed enamel close to the DEJ. Multiple, somewhat convoluted and sometimes branching, cracks spread and diffused damage over a wide area of adjacent enamel rather than producing catastrophic interfacial failure. Other secondary mechanisms included short microcracks in the DEJ adjacent dentin with possible cracked bridging, as well as plastic deformation of the DEJ without delamination. A DEJ-zone fracture toughness of approximately 0.8 to 0.9 MPa·m1/2 was calculated.
Conclusion
DEJ-zone damage occurred primarily within the adjacent layer of specialized first-formed enamel, and the optical DEJ interface resisted delamination.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This study was presented at the meeting of the International Association for Dental Research, San Diego, Calif, March 2002, and the meeting of the Academy of Prosthodontics, Scottsdale, Ariz, May 2005.Funding for this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research under award numbers DE 14189, DE 13045, and DE 13404.
PII: S0022-3913(05)00439-7
doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.013
© 2005 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

