Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 330-335, October 2005

Controlled failure mechanisms toughen the dentino-enamel junction zone

  • S.N. White, BDent Sc, MS, MA, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, UCLA School of Dentistry
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Shane N. White, UCLA School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Ave, CHS 23-010, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, Fax: 310 794 4900
  • ,
  • V.G. Miklus, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Staff Research Associate, UCLA School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • P.P. Chang, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Former student, UCLA School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • A.A. Caputo, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, UCLA School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • H. Fong, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Associate, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington
  • ,
  • M. Sarikaya, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington
  • ,
  • W. Luo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • M.L. Paine, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • M.L. Snead, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry

University of California Los Angeles School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif; University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif

Statement of problem

The dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) durably unites dissimilar hard brittle enamel and tough flexible dentin. In contrast to artificial bonds between restorations and dentin, the DEJ rarely fails except when it is affected by inherited disorders. Knowledge of DEJ toughening mechanisms is important in understanding inherited disorders, in biomimetic engineering of junctions between artificial restorations and teeth, and in tissue-engineering a DEJ.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify specific DEJ-zone failure mechanisms and to survey the fracture toughness of the human DEJ zone.

Material and methods

Fracture toughness indentations were made at 3 sites across the DEJ zone of 10 human incisor teeth. Failure modes identified using optical microscopy and fracture toughness (MPa·m1/2) were calculated following Vickers microindentation. Site mean values were then calculated and compared using 1-way analysis of variance (α=.05).

Results

The DEJ did not undergo catastrophic interfacial delamination; instead, damage was distributed over a broad zone. The primary damage mode involved cracking and damage dispersion in the specialized first-formed enamel close to the DEJ. Multiple, somewhat convoluted and sometimes branching, cracks spread and diffused damage over a wide area of adjacent enamel rather than producing catastrophic interfacial failure. Other secondary mechanisms included short microcracks in the DEJ adjacent dentin with possible cracked bridging, as well as plastic deformation of the DEJ without delamination. A DEJ-zone fracture toughness of approximately 0.8 to 0.9 MPa·m1/2 was calculated.

Conclusion

DEJ-zone damage occurred primarily within the adjacent layer of specialized first-formed enamel, and the optical DEJ interface resisted delamination.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was presented at the meeting of the International Association for Dental Research, San Diego, Calif, March 2002, and the meeting of the Academy of Prosthodontics, Scottsdale, Ariz, May 2005.Funding for this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research under award numbers DE 14189, DE 13045, and DE 13404.

PII: S0022-3913(05)00439-7

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.013

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 330-335, October 2005