Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns

Objectives

To evaluate microleakage and marginal gaps in full cast crown restorations bonded with six different types of cementing agents.

Methods

Sixty non-carious human premolars and molars were prepared in a standardized manner for full cast crown restorations. The mesial and distal margins were located in dentin, while the vestibular and palatal/lingual margins were located in enamel. Crowns were made from a high-gold alloy using a standardized technique. The specimens were randomized to six groups of cementing agents: one zinc-phosphate cement (Harvard cement), one conventional glass–ionomer cement (Fuji I), one resin-modified glass–ionomer cement (Fuji Plus), two standard resin cements (RelyX ARC, Panavia F), and one self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem). After 4 weeks of storage in distilled water at 37°C, the specimens were subjected to 5000 thermocycles ranging from 5 to 55°C. Then, they were placed in a silver nitrate solution, embedded in resin blocks, and vertically cut in buccolingual and mesiodistal direction. Subsequently, the objects were evaluated for microleakage and marginal gap using a high-resolution digital microscope camera.

Results

A number of inter-group differences were statistically significant. RelyX Unicem showed the smallest degree of microleakage both in enamel and in dentin. Panavia F und RelyX Unicem were associated with significantly larger marginal gaps than all other cementing agents. No association was observed between microleakage and marginal gap other than a weak direct correlation when using Harvard cement on enamel.

Significance

The cementing agents investigated revealed different sealing abilities. These differences were not associated with specific types of materials.—Reprinted with permission of The Academy of Dental Materials.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.