Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 129-137, February 2005

Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations

  • Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai, DDS, MSD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Instructor, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard University, School of Dental Medicine
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, Fax: 617-432-0901
  • ,
  • Kanji Ishibashi, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Iwate Medical University, School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • Osamu Tsuruta, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Postgraduate student, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Iwate Medical University, School of Dentistry
  • ,
  • Hans-Peter Weber, DMD, Dr Med Dent

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chairman, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard University, School of Dental Medicine

School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Mass; School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan

Statement of problem

To reproduce tooth color precisely, an objective methodology based on color science is required. However, perception-based techniques are still the primary method for color matching in restorative dentistry.

Purpose

This study evaluated the accuracy of reproduction of color gradation for ceramic restorations using a Computer Color Matching (CCM) technique employing a prototype program and spectrophotometric data measurements.

Materials and methods

The colors of 10 target-shade tabs of the Vitapan 3D Master shade guide were measured at 4 regions of crowns from the cervical to the incisal area using a spectrophotometer. Tooth-shaped CCM ceramic specimens (30 specimens; 3 specimens for each of 10 target-shade tabs), the same size and shape as target-shade tabs, were fabricated according to the CCM prescriptions calculated using a prototype CCM program. The colors of CCM ceramic specimens and target-shade tabs were compared in 10 incremental areas from gingival to incisal (each measuring 1 mm high × 3 mm wide). The color differences, ΔE, ΔL, Δa, and Δb, were calculated. The color difference ΔE values were analyzed by a repeated measures analysis of variance (P<.0001). Three prosthodontists evaluated CCM specimens by perception techniques.

Results

The mean color difference (ΔE) values were clinically acceptable (below 3.6) for incremental areas 3 through 10 and unacceptable for areas 1 and 2 (gingival area). Highly significant differences in the mean of ΔE values among target-shade tabs (P<.0001), areas (P<.0001), and target-shade tab-by-area interaction effects (P<.0001) were noted. However, perceptional evaluation indicated “Definitive match” or “Approximate match” for all CCM specimens.

Conclusion

The CCM technique tested in this study utilizing 4 measurements on target-shade tabs could reproduce tooth color gradation from incisal to precervical regions with clinically acceptable results.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was presented at the 80th IADR meeting in San Diego, March 6 through 9, 2002.

PII: S0022-3913(04)00699-7

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.024

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 129-137, February 2005