Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 171-176, February 2005

Hardness of heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion

  • Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, DDS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Postgraduate Student
  • ,
  • Ana Cláudia Pavarina, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Ana Cláudia Pavarina, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, UNESP, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Rua Humaitá n° 1680, Araraquara São Paulo, BRAZIL C.E.P. 14801-903 Fax: 55-016-33016410
  • ,
  • Carlos Eduardo Vergani, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor
  • ,
  • Eunice Teresinha Giampaolo, DDS, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil

Statement of the problem

In selecting a disinfectant for dental prostheses, compatibility between the disinfectant and the type of denture base material must be considered to avoid adverse effects on the hardness of the acrylic resin.

Purpose

This study investigated the hardness of 2 denture base resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion.

Material and methods

Thirty-two disk-shaped specimens (13 mm in diameter and 8 mm thick) were fabricated from each resin (Lucitone 550 and QC-20), polished, stored in water at 37°C for 48 hours, and submitted to hardness tests (Vickers hardness number [VHN]) before disinfection. Disinfection methods included scrubbing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate for 1 minute, immersion for 10 minutes in 1 of the tested disinfectant solutions (n=8) (3.78% sodium perborate, 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, or 1% sodium hypochorite), and immersion in water for 3 minutes. The disinfection procedures were repeated 4 times, and 12 hardness measurements were made on each specimen. Control specimens (not disinfected) were stored in water for 56 minutes. Hardness tests (VHN) were also performed after 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days of storage in water. Statistical analyses of data were conducted with a repeated measures 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc test (α=.05).

Results

Mean values ± SD for Lucitone 550 (16.52 ± 0.94 VHN) and QC-20 (9.61 ± 0.62 VHN) demonstrated a significant (P<.05) decrease in hardness after disinfection, regardless of material and disinfectant solutions used (Lucitone 550: 15.25 ± 0.74; QC-20: 8.09 ± 0.39). However, this effect was reversed after 15 days of storage in water. Both materials exhibited a continuous increase (P<.05) in hardness values for up to 60 days of water storage, after which no significant change was observed.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, QC-20 and Lucitone 550 specimens exhibited significantly lower hardness values after disinfection regardless of the disinfectant solution used.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(04)00695-X

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.020

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 171-176, February 2005