Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 1 , Pages 51-55, January 2005

Effect of bonding amalgam on the reinforcement of teeth

  • Ammar A. Rasheed, BDS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Ajman University
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Ammar A. Rasheed c/o Hayder A. Rasheed Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University 2118 Fiedler Hall Manhattan, KS 66506 Fax: (785) 587-8605

College of Dentistry at Abu Dhabi, Ajman University, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Statement of problem

Extensively weakened maxillary premolars may be more prone to fracture due to their small size. The weakening may be due to excessive demineralization of supporting tooth structure caused by dental caries or nonconservative or traumatic tooth preparation.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a bonded amalgam restoration on reinforcement of weakened tooth structure.

Material and methods

Forty extracted noncarious maxillary premolars were collected. The teeth were prepared individually with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities with specific dimensions (cavity width buccolingually, 1.8 to 2.1 mm; palatal cusp width, 1.7 to 2.2 mm; cusp height, 4.7 to 5.0 mm) and divided into 4 groups (n=10). The first group was prepared and not restored (control). The other 3 groups were restored with amalgam (Megalloy), bonding agent (Syntac) with amalgam, and amalgam with an adhesive resin luting agent (Resinomer), respectively. Fracture load (in kg) for specimens in all groups was determined by applying a vertical splitting load through a specially shaped steel rod at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and least significant difference statistical tests (α=.01).

Results

The mean force and standard deviation values required to fracture the cusp of the control and amalgam groups were 25.2 ± 3.27 kg and 26.1 ± 3.07 kg , respectively, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>.01). Significant differences were found between control and Syntac groups (29.8 ± 2.80 kg), as well as between control and Resinomer groups (37.9 ± 3.55 kg). Significant difference was also noted between Syntac and Resinomer groups (P>.01)

Conclusion

It was concluded that the use of resin cement increased the fracture resistance of the tooth with an MOD amalgam restoration.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(04)00689-4

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.014

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 93, Issue 1 , Pages 51-55, January 2005