Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 441-446, November 2004

Analysis of strain around endosseous dental implants opposing natural teeth or implants

  • Canan Hekimoglu, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor.
  • ,
  • Nesrin Anıl, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor.
  • ,
  • Murat C. Cehreli, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Murat Cehreli Gazi Mustafa Kemal Bulvarı 61/11 06570 Maltepe Ankara, TURKEY Fax: +90.312.311 3741

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Statement of problem

Natural teeth and implants have different force transmission characteristics to bone.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare strains induced around a natural tooth opposing an implant with strains around occluding implants under static and dynamic loads.

Material and methods

Occlusion was created between a natural molar tooth and an implant in 1 side, and 2 implants in the contralateral side of acrylic resin models of both jaws. Strain-gauges were bonded around the neck of the natural tooth and implants, and strains were measured under 75 N and 100 N static axial and lateral dynamic loads in separate load situations using a data acquisition system at sample rate of 1000 Hz. The strain data of the natural tooth and implants were compared for each load by Kruskal-Wallis testing followed by the multiple comparison test (α=.05).

Results

Compressive strains were induced around natural tooth and implants as a result of static axial loading, whereas combinations of compressive and tensile strains were observed during lateral dynamic loading. Strains around the natural tooth were significantly lower than the opposing implant and occluding implants in the contralateral side for most regions under all loading conditions (P<.05). There was a general tendency for increased strains around the implant opposing natural tooth under higher loads and particularly under lateral dynamic loading (P<.05).

Conclusion

Under static and dynamic loads, strain magnitudes around a natural tooth were significantly lower than that of an opposing implant and occluding implants in the contralateral side.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the Scientific Research Unit of Hacettepe University (Project No. 0102201005).

PII: S0022-3913(04)00489-5

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.023

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 441-446, November 2004