Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 486-490, November 2004

Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain

  • Michael D. Wright, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Former Resident, Post-Graduate Prosthodontic Program, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery.
  • ,
  • Radi Masri, BDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Instructor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Radi Masri Room 3D08, Restorative Department Baltimore College of Dental Surgery University of Maryland, Baltimore 666 West Baltimore St Baltimore, MD 21201 Fax: (410) 706-3028
  • ,
  • Carl F. Driscoll, DMD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery.
  • ,
  • Elaine Romberg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral Health Care Delivery, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery.
  • , Col.
  • Geoffrey A. Thompson, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Chief, Biomaterials Branch, United States Army Dental Research Detachment.
  • , Col.
  • Dennis A. Runyan, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Commander, United States Army Dental Research Detachment.

Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Md; United States Army Dental Research Detachment, Great Lakes, Ill

Statement of the problem

With the introduction of newer dental porcelains, there exists the need to evaluate different porcelain polishing systems available on the market.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the surface roughness produced by 3 different porcelain polishing systems on an ultra-low fusing porcelain.

Material and methods

Sixty-three ultra-low fusing porcelain (Finesse) discs (10 × 2 mm) were fabricated and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=21). Both sides of each disc were abraded with a medium-grit diamond bur. One side was autoglazed and was considered a control. The other side was polished until the surface appeared shiny to the naked eye using 1 of 3 porcelain polishing kits (Axis Dental, Jelenko, and Brasseler systems). The surface of each disc was evaluated quantitatively with surface profilometry and qualitatively using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A mean roughness profile (Ra) value was determined for each side of each specimen to describe the overall roughness of the surface. The Ra mean difference for each specimen was determined by subtracting the mean experimental readings (polished surface) from the mean control readings (glazed surface) and was used for the statistical analysis. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by a Tukey multiple comparison test (α=.05). Representative specimens from each group were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy.

Results

The Axis porcelain polishing system produced a smoother surface than the Brasseler or Jelenko systems (0.586 ± 0.256, 0.306 ± 0.238, and 0.277 ± 0.230, respectively). No significant difference was found between the Jelenko and Brasseler porcelain polishing kits (F=10.6, P<.001). The images obtained through SEM were evaluated and found to be consistent with the profilometer readings.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, all 3 porcelain polishing systems produced a surface smoother than the autoglazed surface of Finesse. The Axis system provided a significantly smoother surface compared to the Brasseler and Jelenko polishing systems.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Dental Research, San Diego, Calif, March 2002, and at the Annual Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics, Chicago, Ill, March, 2003.This project was partially funded by a Tylman Grant from the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics.

PII: S0022-3913(04)00487-1

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.021

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 486-490, November 2004