Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 4 , Pages 371-376, October 2004

Designing visually optimal shade guides

  • Mostafa Analoui, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Director, Pfizer Global Research and Development.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Mostafa Analoui Pfizer Global Research and Development Eastern Point Rd Groton, CT 06340 Fax: 860-686-1680
  • ,
  • Evrika Papkosta, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Private practice, Athens, Greece.
  • ,
  • Michael Cochran, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Indiana University.
  • ,
  • Bruce Matis, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Indiana University.

Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind

Statement of problem

Dental shade guides do not provide a broad coverage of tooth colors. There is a need for shade guides that can provide closer color matches.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to propose and assess a visually optimal shade guide for tooth color matching.

Material and methods

With the use of a spectrophotometric approach, the color distribution (Lab) of 150 extracted human teeth and 3 commercially available shade guides (Vita Lumin V, Trubyte Bioform Color Order Shade Guide, and Vitapan 3D-Master Shade System) was measured. With the use of a hierarchical clustering approach, a series of shade guides was designed with a varying number of tabs. The average error (ΔE) between colors from each shade guide and the extracted teeth was computed.

Results

The proposed visually optimal shade guide had the smallest average error of all guides tested. The new guide achieved lower error with fewer shade tabs than the 3 commercial systems evaluated.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, it was demonstrated that a hierarchical clustering technique can be used to design a visually optimal shade guide for a given population with a flexible degree of control over the mean error and number of tabs.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(04)00425-1

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.028

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 4 , Pages 371-376, October 2004