Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 4 , Pages 348-353, October 2004

Thermo-hydrolytic stability of core foundation and restorative composites

  • Mansuang Arksornnukit, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok Thailand
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Mansuang Arksornnukit Chulalongkorn Universtiy Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry 34 Henri-Dunant Rd. Bangkok, 10330 THAILAND Fax: 66-2-218-8534
  • ,
  • Hidekazu Takahashi, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Advanced Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Sciences, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo Japan

Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract 

Statement of problem

The use of weak and less durable materials in restoring teeth may result in weak restorations unable to withstand intraoral conditions.

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of thermo-hydrolytic stress on the flexural strength and flexural modulus of core foundation composites with direct restorative composites and determine mass percentage of filler content.

Material and methods

A total of 216 specimens, from 9 brands of commercially available composites (Coreflo, DC Core, Photocore, APX, Litefil II A, Surefil, TPH Spectrum, Z100, and Z250) were fabricated following ISO Standard 4049. Flexural strength (MPa) and flexural modulus (GPa) were determined on bar-shaped specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) before and after storage in boiling water for 24 hours (n=12). The filler content in composite was determined by incineration using a thermogravimetric analyzer. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and the Student t test (α=.05).

Results

Filler content of the tested composites was 66.6 to 81.8 mass %. Significant differences in both flexural strength and flexural modulus existed among materials, the effect of boiling and interaction (P<.05). Coreflo, DC Core, Z100, and Z250 demonstrated a significant decrease in flexural strength after boiling (P<.05). Z250 showed a significant decrease in flexural modulus after boiling (P=.001), while Surefil showed a significant increase in flexural modulus (P=.007).

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that composites were affected differently by moist heat stress. Some composites showed a degradation of flexural properties while some retained flexural properties. Stability of the composites varied among brands.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(04)00340-3

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.009

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 4 , Pages 348-353, October 2004