Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 79-82, July 2004

Repair strength of autopolymerizing, microwave, and conventional heat-polymerized acrylic resins

  • Rodrigo Nunes Rached, DDS, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Dental Materials; Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR), Dental Branch Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to:Dr Rodrigo Nunes Rachied Rua Imaculada Conceição 1155 PUCPR-CCBS Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil Cep Fax: 55 41 271-1405
  • ,
  • John M. Powers, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, and Director, Houston Biomaterials Research Center; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Brazil
  • ,
  • Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury, DDS, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics and Prosthodontics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba Dental School Brazil

Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR), Dental Branch, Curitiba, Brazil; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Dental Branch, Houston, Tex; State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, Brazil

Abstract 

Statement of problem

Acrylic resin dentures are susceptible to fracture after clinical use. The repair procedure should be time saving, strong, and should not affect dimensional accuracy.

Purpose

This study evaluated the transverse repair strength of a conventional heat-polymerized (Lucitone 199, “L”) and a microwave-polymerized (Acron MC, “A”) acrylic resin that were repaired with these same resins and with an autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Acron MC/R, “AR”).

Material and methods

Twenty-four rectangular specimens (65.0 × 10.0 × 3.3 mm) of L or A and 6 of AR were manufactured according to ISO/FDI 1567 and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 7 days. Eighteen specimens of L or A were selected randomly. Six specimens of each material remained intact (control), each 6 were sectioned in the middle to create a 10-mm gap and repaired with the materials L, A, or AR. After an additional 7 days of storage at 37°C, the transverse strength (MPa) of the repaired and intact specimens was measured using a 3-point bending test. A 2-way ANOVA and a Tukey HSD test were performed to identify significant differences (α=.05). The nature of the failure was noted as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.

Results

The intact and repaired specimens showed similar transverse strength values (MPa), except for A-intact (80.6 ± 2.9), which was significantly stronger (P<.05) than the other materials tested as well as the repaired groups (P<.05). No differences were detected among the repaired groups. Repaired specimens exhibited 3 types of failures: adhesive (interface), cohesive (only in the repair material), and mixed (interface and repair material), with incidences of 2.8, 25, and 72.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

The autopolymerizing resin exhibited a repair strength similar to those found for the conventional heat- and microwave-polymerized materials.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nı́vel Superior), Sandwich-Doctorate Scholarship # BEX 1046-98/5.

PII: S0022-3913(04)00208-2

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.005

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 79-82, July 2004