Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 27-34, July 2004

Evaluation of disinfected casts poured in gypsum with gum arabic and calcium hydroxide additives

  • Khalid M. Abdelaziz, BDS, MScD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Formerly Visiting Assistant Professor, Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota. Lecturer, Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University Egypt
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Khalid M. Abdelaziz Department of Dental Materials Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University Mansoura, DK 35516 EGYPT. Fax: (2) 050-226-0173
  • ,
  • Ahmed Attia, MScD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University Egypt
  • ,
  • Edward C. Combe, PhD, DSc

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, School of Dentistry, University of MinnesotaUSA

Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; and School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn

Abstract 

Statement of problem

Disinfection of stone casts is an important measure for the control of cross-contamination. Many approaches have been used to disinfect stone casts, but information regarding the accuracy of the resultant casts is limited.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy, incidence of abutment fracture, and the abutment reproduction of disinfected stone casts made from elastomeric impressions and to determine the effect of gum arabic and calcium hydroxide additives on these properties.

Material and methods

Two aqueous solutions of chemical disinfectants (0.525% sodium hypochlorite and 0.1% povidone iodine) were used as mixing water substitutes for 3 types of dental stone: Types III (Lab Stone), IV (Mile Stone), and V (Die Keen). These stone powders were subjected to further modification by adding 1% gum arabic and 0.132% calcium hydroxide before mixing at the manufacturer-recommended liquid/powder ratios (0.30 for Type III, 0.21 for Types IV and V, respectively). As these additives increased the fluidity of the mix, reduced liquid/powder ratios (0.26 for Type III, 0.19 for Types IV and V, respectively) were also evaluated. Unmodified stone powder mixed with water served as the control. These modifications resulted in 7 test groups for each type of stone. Mixed stones of these groups were poured into 10 putty/wash vinyl polysiloxane impressions made of a customized definitive cast. The percentage of abutments fractured at the time of releasing the resultant casts, as well as the percentages of incompletely reproduced abutments, abutments with air bubbles, and abutments with defective finish lines were compared statistically among the tested groups using the chi-square test (α=.05). The average dimensional deviations of the resultant cast from the definitive cast measured in mm were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA (α=.05) followed by the Dunnett test to detect any differences among the tested groups.

Results

No significant difference was found in abutment fracture or abutment defects for the different formulations of each type of stone used. The resultant casts showed no significant dimensional changes except for Type III and IV stones modified by gum arabic and calcium hydroxide additives and mixed at the recommended liquid/powder ratios.

Conclusion

Both 0.525% sodium hypochlorite and 0.1% povidone iodine can be used to disinfect dental gypsum with no significant effect on the dimensional accuracy and reproducibility of the resultant casts. Addition of gum arabic and calcium hydroxide to the hemihydrate powders before mixing does not aid in reducing the incidence of defective abutment reproduction.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented by the first author at the 13th International Alexandria Dental Congress, Alexandria, Egypt, October 29 through November 1, 2002.

PII: S0022-3913(04)00206-9

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.004

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 27-34, July 2004