Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 234-240, March 2004

The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures

  • Sawako Yokoyama, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Post-graduate student, Implantology, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Sawako Yokoyama 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo Tokyo 113-8549 JAPAN Fax: 81-3-5803-5842
  • ,
  • Noriyuki Wakabayashi, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Associate, Removable Prosthodontics, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation Japan
  • ,
  • Makoto Shiota, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Implantology, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation Japan
  • ,
  • Takashi Ohyama, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Chair, Removable Prosthodontics, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation Japan

Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract 

Statement of the problem

The influence of implant location for an implant-supported cantilever fixed partial denture (FPD) on stress distribution in the bone has not been sufficiently assessed.

Purpose

This study examined the influence of location and length of implants on stress distribution for 3-unit posterior FPDs in the posterior mandibular bone.

Material and methods

Each 3-D finite element model included an FPD, mesial and distal implants, and supporting bone. The mesial implant with a length of 10 mm or 12 mm was placed in locations where its long axis was 3 mm to 11 mm posterior to the remaining first premolar. The distal implant with a length of 10 mm was fixed at the same distance from the premolar on each model. A buccally-oriented oblique occlusal force of 100 N was placed on each occlusal surface of the FPD.

Results

The maximum equivalent stresses were shown at the cervical region in the cortical bone adjacent to the mesial or the distal implants. Relatively high stresses of up to 73 MPa were shown adjacent to the mesial implant located 9 mm or more posterior to the first premolar. The use of a 12-mm-long mesial implant demonstrated a relatively weak influence on stress reduction.

Conclusion

The implant location in the cantilever FPDs was a significant factor influencing the stress created in the bone.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the 81st General Session of the International Association for Dental Research, Göteborg, Sweden, June 2003.Supported by Grants in Aid for Scientific Research, 12771170 (N.W.) and 14571840 (N.W.), from The Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.

PII: S0022-3913(03)00861-8

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.017

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 234-240, March 2004