Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 90, Issue 2 , Pages 121-132, August 2003

Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses

Presented at the Greater New York Academy of Prosthodontics annual meeting in New York, NY on December 1, 2000. Presented at the Academy of Prosthodontics meeting in Santa Fe, NM on May 21, 2001. Presented at the Annual Session of the American College of Prosthodontists, Orlando, Fla., November 7, 2002.

  • Charles J Goodacre, DDS, MSD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Dean, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif., USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr Charles J. Goodacre, Loma Linda University, School of Dentistry, Office of the Dean, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA, Fax: 909-558-0483
  • ,
  • Guillermo Bernal, DDS, MSD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor and Director, Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif., USA
  • ,
  • Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif., USA
  • ,
  • Joseph Y.K Kan, DDS, MS

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif., USA

Abstract 

The purpose of this article is to identify the types of complications that have been reported in conjunction with endosseous root form implants and associated implant prostheses. A Medline and an extensive hand search were performed on English-language publications beginning in 1981. The searches focused on publications that contained clinical data regarding success/failure/complications. The complications were divided into the following 6 categories: surgical, implant loss, bone loss, peri-implant soft tissue, mechanical, and esthetic/phonetic. The raw data were combined from multiple studies and means calculated to identify trends noted in the incidences of complications. The most common implant complications (those with a greater than a 15% incidence) were loosening of the overdenture retentive mechanism (33%), implant loss in irradiated maxillae (25%), hemorrhage-related complications (24%), resin veneer fracture with fixed partial dentures (22%), implant loss with maxillary overdentures (21%), overdentures needing to be relined (19%), implant loss in type IV bone (16%), and overdenture clip/attachment fracture (16%). It was not possible to calculate an overall complications incidence for implant prostheses because there were not multiple clinical studies that simultaneously evaluated all or most of the categories of complications. Although the implant data had to be obtained from different studies, they do indicate a trend toward a greater incidence of complications with implant prostheses than single crowns, fixed partial dentures, all-ceramic crowns, resin-bonded prostheses, and posts and cores.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3913(03)00212-9

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 90, Issue 2 , Pages 121-132, August 2003