Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 290-296, September 2002

Comparative study of circumferential clasp retention force for titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures☆☆★★♢♢

Abstract of Master's degree dissertation presented at the Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, São Paulo University. Major area: oral rehabilitation.

Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract 

Statement of Problem. The interest in using titanium to fabricate removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks has increased, but there are few studies to support its use. Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare circumferential RPD clasps made of commercially pure titanium and identical clasps made of 2 different cobalt (Co)-chromium (Cr) alloys by testing insertion/removal and radiographically inspecting the casts for defects. Material and Methods. On refractory casts that represent a partially edentulous mandibular right hemi-arch segment, 36 frameworks were cast from commercially pure titanium (n = 12) and 2 Co-Cr alloys (n = 12 each) with identical prefabricated patterns and the manufacturer-designated investment and casting technique. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups, corresponding to .25-mm and .50-mm undercuts, respectively. No polishing procedures were performed to ensure uniformity. Only nodules and burs were carefully removed with tungsten burs under magnification when necessary. The specimens were radiographed and subjected to an insertion/removal test simulating 5 years of framework use. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and the Tukey complementary test (P<.01) to compare the retentive forces of RPDs made with the different materials. The Student t test (P<.01) was used to compare the retentive forces of RPDs fabricated with the same alloy with different undercuts. Results. A total of 20% of the titanium specimens demonstrated porosity, showing casting difficulties, and any defect detected on the clasps determined the sample replacement. For Co-Cr alloys, casting difficulties were not found. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and the Tukey complementary test to compare materials for the same undercut. For the .25-mm undercut, no significant difference was found between Magnum and Rematitan alloys; they were both different from the Remanium alloy (P<.01). For the .50-mm undercut, no significant difference was found between Co-Cr alloys; they were both different from Rematitan alloy (P<.01). The Student t test used to compare the same alloys with different undercuts showed no significant difference between Remanium with .25-mm and .50-mm undercuts. For Magnum and Rematitan alloys, there was a significant difference between different undercuts (P=.01). Conclusion. Within the limitations of this simulation study, the results suggest that commercially pure titanium clasps maintained retention over a simulated 5-year period, with lower retention force than identical Co-Cr clasps. (J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:290-6.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprints request to: Dr Ricardo Faria Ribeiro, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, São Paulo University, Av do Café, s/n Monte Alegre 14040-904, Ribeirão Preto, SP BRAZIL, E-mail: rribeiro@forp.usp.br

☆☆ Supported by grant No. 98/12553-2 from FAPESP.

 aGraduate student, Dental Materials and Prosthesis Department.

★★ bAssistant Professor of Removable Partial Prosthesis, Dental Materials and Prosthesis Department.

 cAssociate Professor of Removable Partial Prosthesis, Dental Materials and Prosthesis Department.

♢♢ dHead Professor of Removable Partial Prosthesis, Dental Materials and Prosthesis Department.

PII: S0022-3913(02)00200-7

doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.128128

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 290-296, September 2002