Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 83, Issue 2 , Pages 194-203, February 2000

Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences☆☆★★

New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, N.J

Abstract 

Statement of problem. Microleakage is an important problem with direct filling restorations and an understanding of the factors that contribute to it is of critical importance. Purpose. This study investigated the effect of thermal and occlusal load cycling, and limited cavity preparation on microleakage of compomer Class V restorations in vitro. Material and methods. Class V cavities were randomly prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 32 recently extracted molars and premolars and restored with Dyract compomer restorative system as per the manufacturer’s directions. Teeth were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups with 8 teeth in each group: (I) thermocycling only; (II) load cycling only; (III) both thermocycling and load cycling; and (IV) no treatment. All teeth were then immersed in 2% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. Dye penetration was measured linearly using color photographic prints. ANOVA, comparisons between means, and correlation were used to analyze the results. Results. Thermocycling and cavity preparation had a significant effect on microleakage, but load cycling did not. Occlusal margins leaked more than the gingival margins. Conclusion. Class V restorations demonstrated increased microleakage under the conditions of thermal cycling and nonretentive cavity design. More microleakage occurred at occlusal margins than at gingival margins. The effect of load cycling is complicated by considerations of the types of stresses applied and the restorative material response to such stresses. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:194-203.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was partially supported by a shared instrumentation grant SI ORRO4216 by the Division of Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

☆☆ Based on a thesis submitted (S.H.) to the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UMDNJ, New Jersey’s University of Health Sciences in partial fulfillment of requirements of MS degree in Oral Biology.

 Reprint requests to: DR JAYALAKSHMI VAIDYANATHAN, DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHODONTICS AND BIOMATERIALS, NJ DENTAL SCHOOL, UMDNJ—NEW JERSEY’S UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 110 BERGEN ST, NEWARK, NJ 07103, FAX: (973)972-0370, E-MAIL: jvaidyan@umdnj.edu

★★ 0022-3913/2000/$12.00 + 0. 10/1/104282

PII: S0022-3913(00)70111-9

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume 83, Issue 2 , Pages 194-203, February 2000